|
| Home Locate an Eye Surgeon Procedures Videos LASIK FAQ Articles Ask an Expert Blog | July 3, 2009 |
Eyes of the Tiger: Tiger Woods - LASIK laser eye surgeryCraig Bestrom and John StregeWoods is one of many tour players who have had LASIK laser eye surgery. Has it helped their games, and can it help yours? Patient: Tiger Woods Occupation: Professional golfer Diagnosis: Severe nearsightedness. Vision is 20/15 with contacts. Patient's complaint: Wants to play without contacts, which are cumbersome and bother him in windy and rainy conditions. Objective: 20/15 vision without contacts. Ability to discard contacts. Referred by: Friends, other tour golfers. Procedure: Oct. 1, 1999 Note: Patient is more concerned about how different weather conditions will affect his eyesight and his game post-LASIK than he is about the procedure itself. Golfers, it seems, will try anything to lower their scores. How else can you explain the recent inquiry by a struggling tour pro, one who does not even wear glasses or contact lenses, about Lasik laser eye surgery as a cure for putting woes? "I won't embarrass the guy by saying who it was," says Dr. Mark Whitten, the Rockville, Md.-based ophthalmologist who has performed laser eye surgery on close to 60 players from the PGA, LPGA and senior tours, "but he came all the way out here just certain that there was something wrong with his vision. When I checked his eyes and realized his vision was fine, I had to tell him his problems weren't because of his eyes." No, Lasik is not for everyone. And beneath the attention the procedure has received in the past few years lies the sometimes overlooked truth that Lasik is much more a cosmetic surgery than it is a miracle cure. That's not to say you won't see better after Lasik. In fact, you'll probably eliminate the need for glasses or contact lenses. But there are no guarantees it will improve your golf game, and some optometrists caution it might make things worse. Just as in all surgical procedures, things can go wrong. And that includes risks of minor and major complications. Lasik (the acronym for laser assisted in situ keratomileusis) became widely available to the public in the mid-'90s, and has rapidly grown into a $2-billion-a-year industry. It is the most popular elective surgery in the U.S., with more than 2.6 million Americans having undergone the procedure in the past six years. Lasik, which typically takes 10 to 15 minutes, involves a surgeon creating a corneal flap. The flap is then peeled back and a laser is used to reshape the cornea. Once the cornea is reshaped, light rays coming into the eye will properly focus on the retina for clear vision. It's a process so routine that some patients are getting it done during a visit to the mall, sometimes paying substantially less than the $1,800 to $2,500 per eye that some of the larger, and perhaps more reputable, centers are charging. "I don't think you want your eyes done on coupons," says Whitten, who performed Lasik on Tiger Woods in October 1999. "I also don't believe that excellent, well-trained doctors are going to put up with being paid $20 or $25 out of the $299 [per eye] some places are charging." Trends develop quickly on tour, and when Woods validated the procedure, Lasik became the hot ticket. Before laser eye surgery, Woods without contact lenses could barely see past his own shadow, and Bermuda grain was easier to read than the big "E" at the top of the eye chart. "He had what I call 'counting fingers vision,' " says Whitten. "He could only count my fingers a foot from his face." Woods' post-Lasik vision is 20/15 without corrective lenses, and he says that the hole looks bigger and his ability to read greens has improved dramatically. Coincidence or not, Woods won the first five tour events he played after having the surgery. Then he won four consecutive majors beginning with the U.S. Open in 2000. Now 211/42 years removed from the surgery, Woods says he's still happy as ever with his vision. "I was apprehensive, just like anyone else would be when their vision is going to be altered," says Woods, who received $2 million to endorse the TLC Laser Eye Centers, "but I was prepared, because I researched everything, and I had a lot of faith in Dr. Whitten." Today the list of Lasik patients includes U.S. Open champion Retief Goosen, Scott Hoch, Jesper Parnevik, Vijay Singh, Hal Sutton, Lee Westwood and Mike Weir; LPGA stars Juli Inkster, Se Ri Pak and Laura Davies; and senior players Tom Kite and Hale Irwin. Each of the tour pros we talked with expressed satisfaction with their post-Lasik vision, and it's important to note that all of them had it done for free. Even players who had complications during and after the surgery say they have no regrets. Paul Stankowski, a two-time winner on tour, suffered what's called a "flap complication" during his Lasik surgery, when the corneal cap of his eyeball became completely detached. "No big deal," says Stankowski, "They put a contact on overnight, and that's it. Took it off and my eye was fine." Stankowski had merely become a statistic, representing the 1-in-5,000 nationally who have a flap complication from this form of laser eye surgery. Today his vision is "perfect," and he no longer needs contact lenses. "A lot of guys on tour have had it done, and nobody I know has had a problem," Stankowski says. "Now, I wouldn't recommend it to anybody who just wants to improve their golf game, because it's not going to make them any better, but I would recommend it to anyone who is tired of wearing glasses or contacts. I don't see any better now than I did with contacts. It's just easier without them." Enhancements after the initial surgery Canadian Ian Leggatt, a first-time winner on the PGA Tour this season, also knows a thing or two about Lasik complications. Leggatt, who had extreme nearsightedness in both eyes before having the surgery in October 2000, says it was about a week after the initial procedure before he was seeing normally again. But by Christmas, he was experiencing chronically dry eyes and blurry vision, so he went back to his surgeon. Enhancements, which are procedures performed after the initial surgery in an attempt to achieve better visual acuity, are necessary roughly 5 to 10 percent of the time, depending on the severity of the prescription. Most quality surgeons perform enhancements on 3 to 8 percent of their patients, which means they're not trying to over-correct the first time and are willing to improve things down the road. "Enhancements have nothing to do with the procedure or with anything other than the healing properties of that person," Whitten says. "The more an eye has to be corrected, the harder it is to predict healing." In Leggatt's case, healing was the biggest problem. After missing nine cuts in his first 12 events of 2001, he was sure he wasn't seeing as well as he had with contact lenses. By October, a year after his initial surgery, Leggatt's vision was blurry again, so in November he went in for a second enhancement that solved everything. "Obviously, I wish everything had turned out fine the first time, and that I wouldn't have needed the enhancements, but I'm seeing awesome today," says Leggatt. "It's not like I was ever going blind or anything." According to Market Scope, the leading source of information on the refractive surgical market, there were 1.3 million Lasik procedures in the U.S. in 2001, and there are about 1,200 laser centers across the nation. Because no one agrees on what exactly constitutes a complication, it's difficult to estimate the number of surgeries that don't go as planned. Although Lasik is marketed as a quick and painless way to improve your vision, websites like www.surgicaleyes.org and www.lasikdisaster.com include horror stories. Richard Robinson, an attorney from Buffalo, N.Y., who handles malpractice, says Lasik lawsuits are on the rise. Robinson represented a client who won a $1.25-million judgment in 2000 after suffering a laceration extending through the cornea, iris and lens of the right eye during the procedure. In Kentucky, a 38-year-old woman received $1.7 million after laser surgery left her legally blind in her left eye. "If you turn on the radio or look in the newspaper, you'd think Lasik is the greatest thing since sliced bread," says Dr. Don Teig, director of the Institute for Sports Vision in Ridgefield, Conn., and the vision consultant for the New York Yankees and New York Knicks. In Teig's opinion, nine out of 10 people probably enjoy crisper vision with contact lenses than they will after Lasik surgery. "Lasik sounds like a brilliant thing," says two-time U.S. Open champion Ernie Els, who wears contact lenses and hasn't had the surgery. "But sometimes it might be better not to change the way you see things. People sometimes try to make things too perfect." Before Lasik, without contacts: Tiger was severely nearsighted and could see no more than about one foot in front of his face, according to Dr. Mark Whitten. Before Lasik, with contacts: Tiger's vision was excellent-- 20/15--as long as he wore his contact lenses. The only difficulty was keeping them clean on windy days. Post Lasik: Since he had the procedure on Oct. 1, 1999, Tiger says everything--especially the hole and the ball--looks bigger. He won the first five tour events he played in after the surgery More Laser Eye Surgery Articles |
Search
for a Corrective Eye Surgery Specialist We only list Licensed Corrective Eye Surgeons, bringing you the quality specialists you deserve. Select a state from the list below: Enter Our Drawing Every month, we give away Visa Gift Cards to help pay for your Eye Surgery Procedures! Financing Finance your Corrective Eye Surgery for Better Vision Now! LASIK and Corrective Eye Surgery FAQ Read our Corrective Eye Surgery Frequently Asked Questions!    |
Please read the full Privacy Policy & Terms and Conditions. By entering the website, you are agreeing to be bound by these Terms & Conditions.
© 2008 NKP Medical Marketing, Inc. · 10220 Culver Blvd · Suite 208 · Culver City, CA 90232